既然明光社回應我們的訴求,承認自己以前「推廣」道德的手法有誤,可能傷及了其他人,為此向所有人道歉,但是道歉當然是要有誠意,而且最基本的是要得到受傷害的一方接受才算是道歉。另外,按中國的傳統道德,道歉者不單單要誠心誠意道歉,並為表明自己為自己行為負全責,作出補償,反省自己,如此才能保證將來不用同一方式來傷害他人,這樣我們會尊重明光社為君子。

太凡是君子,一言既出,駟馬難追,要是現在明光社反過來說是我們過份要求,明光社從來沒有說過什麼道歉的話,又是被人誤解,又或者像克林頓一樣把道歉說成不代表道歉,說我們是得勢不饒人,是打壓基督徒等等,則恐怕會令眼晴雪亮的大多數人更婢視明光社的社格。

我提出最好的道歉方法,就是依孔子的「己所不欲,勿施於人」以及聖經中的「以牙還牙,以眼還眼」的教誨來行,以彼之道,還彼之身,就是我心目中的公平公義。

所以明光社用近千萬賣了廿十多天報紙頭版來醜化同性戀者為公共衛生危機;
我本來想代其他受害者,要求它用近千萬賣了廿十多天報紙頭版來為此道歉,但要考慮它在基督教徒中的面子;

所以我提議不如如此(如有更好主意,請各位高人賜教,本人感激不盡!):
賣三天報紙頭版頭版為來六四死難者致哀,懇求中共國釋放所有政治犯及地下基督/天主教會以及法輪功成員,開放黨禁,解除中共國互聯網網域對異見網站的封鎖;
賣三天報紙頭版頭版來敦促香港特區政府盡快推行民主普選,並自願放棄基督教在特首選舉委員會中的一票,實現聖經中的公平公義;
賣三天報紙頭版頭版來向全香港基督徒道歉,因為明光社令基督教的印象受沉重打擊,更令自由派基督面對被兩面夾攻的困境;
賣三天報紙頭版頭版來為在公民教育課程中的歪曲人權慨念一事向全香港的中學生及他們的父母道歉,,
賣三天報紙頭版頭版來為中大學生報一事,令三位編緝的前途受損而道歉,
賣三天報紙頭版頭版來為同志.戀人一事中,意圖用投訴作政治工具,封鎖異見聲音,向全港市民道歉,
賣三天報紙頭版頭版來為秋天的童話一事中,令想看原版電影而被迫待到深夜的市民道歉,
賣三天報紙頭版頭版來為14K衫一事中,令合法經營生意的服裝商店,無端蒙上不白之怨,商譽及生意受打擊而道歉,
賣三天報紙頭版頭版來為曾經大力醜化GLBT,令守法奉公的同性戀者被無端端當成公共衛生危機,生人勿近而道歉;
賣三天報紙頭版頭版來向光明會道歉,因它曾意圖濫用版權法及自己的雄厚財力來恐嚇三名未滿18歲的年青人,迫他們收聲;
賣三天報紙頭版頭版來為蘇穎智的荒謬言論道歉(如此事真的與明光社並無關係,此項可改為「明光社並不贊成亦不認同蘇穎智的言論」),
賣三天報紙頭版頭版來利用學校回條製做假民意的事道歉(如此事真的與明光社並無關係,此項可改為「明光社並不贊成亦不認同該學校的處事手法」)。

最後,亦是最重要的一項,請在各中英文報紙共8份的頭版,幫我賣一則向冰漓求婚的廣告,內容由我決定。如冰漓接受我,則我本人會放棄在各網誌中攻擊明光社。

一言既出,駟馬難追!

My opinion is that: In according to traditional Chinese value, we can NOT accept the apology on the behalf of other parties damaged by STL's past transgression. So STL have to apologize individually to each group/person it transgress.

Moreover, since Confucian said 'Do Unto other do to yourself', as well as what Bible has said: 'An eye for an eye, an stone for a stone.' It is imperative that STL attempt to undone what damage it caused in the past.

Since STL has defame GLBT as 'cause of Public Hygiene crisis' on frontpage of major newspapers for 2x consecutive day, therefore it is fair to ask STL to do the following advertisement on all major newspaper frontpage:

3 days on remembrance of all the victim in June 4 massacre, urge Communist China to release all political prisoner and underground member of Catholic and Protestant religion, halt the online censorship mechanism(Golden Shield);

3 days for urging HKSAR to push forward its plan for universal suffrage as soon as possible, and promise to give up their political privilege in the Election Committee for Chief Executive;

3 days for apologizing to all Christian for undermining the image of Christianity, especially to liberal Christian has suffered attack from both sides;

3 days for apologizing to editor of CUSP newspaper whose future are badly wound by STL's unfounded accusation of promoting bestiality and incest;

3 days for apologizing the distortion of concept of human right in their 'Human Right' course they taught to many Secondary School students;

3 days for apologizing the damage it caused to law-abiding business by '14k T-shirt' incident;

3 days for apologizing for it's attempt to suppress opinion of GLBT in gay marriage issue by abusing censorship mechanism to all Hong Kong citizen; which is later overturned by a costly court battle.

3 days for apologizing the inconvenience it caused by its complain of abusive language in 'The FairyTale of Autumn' to TVB audience, which force TVB to move the uncensored version to midnight.

3 days for apologizing for the defamation of GLBT in 2X consecutive day of advertisement campaign against extending Discrimination ordinance to include sexual preference, which made them the target of hate and discrimination;

3 days for apologizing to three teenager light truth society members which it attempt to silence by intentionally confusing copyright and 'Fake website attempt to steal personal information.' and threatening to wage legal battle.

3 days for apologizing on the behalf of Pastor So on his speech that relating Gay to the cause of AIDS. If there is no relationship between Pastor So's speech and STL, then STL should stated clearly that 'STL doesn't endorse the above statement made by Pastor So. It doesn't represent the position of STL.'

3 days apologizing to students who are forced by school to hand it a return letter which stating their support for strengthening the censorship law. If there is no relationship between the school's action and STL, then STL should stated clearly that 'STL doesn't endorse the above action made by (school name). We deny any relationship with the action done by (school name).'

1 day on all Chinese and English newspaper frontpage for me to profess my love on oneirocriticism. If I can marry her, I promise that I would cease all attack on STL in my blogs.